Saturday 23 October 2021

WTF as a Historical Stance, "Ikusa no Ko"

--In these past few days I managed to retrieve the missing volumes of the local release of The Legend of Oda Saburo Nobunaga (いくさの子 ~織田三郎信長伝~, Ikusa no Ko ~Oda Saburo Nobunaga den~) by Tetsuo Hara and while reading the absurdities in there I thought of the recently reviewed Yasuke.
Why did I feel so outraged by the work of Lesean, and why am I so patronizing towards Hara-sensei? I wouldn't say because of the contents of the two works, they imply the same exact quantity of fantasy elements, but my tolerance surged by the different "approach", that probably made Ikusa no Ko more tollerable.

First of all, scriptwriter Seibou Kitahara, aka Nobihiko Horie, knows his deal. This story deals with Nobunaga starting from his younger days as the unreliable young lord of Owari and it's supposed to end with the Battle of Okehazama. Long story short, it deals with that part of Nobunaga's life that nobody knew about, and due to this, it abuses of this lack of knowledge to throw Nobunaga into the worst adventures ever (always following the same pattern, with Nobu being kidnapped for some reason and the little shit managing to escape thanks to his charismatic skillz).
Not sure if Hara and Kitahara are supported by a historian, but the historical approach of this manga is quite legit.
You can tell that there are some obvious fabrications, but you do feel a solid foundation in the narrative, too.

For example, the manga takes it good time to tell us about the situation of Owari, to introduce the powers in action or the relationships between the various branches of the families.
The festival of Tsushima, for example, becomes a vital element to explain us the strong relationship between Nobunaga and his father, but also many aspects of Nobunaga's personality tied to his childhood.

The relationship between Nobunaga and Nobuhide is adorable, and it definitely lacks the harshness of the historical chronicles.
Kitahara explains how he decided to change that to favour the dramatic element, for this same purpose he showed us Nobuhide dancing "Atsumori" before dying in front of Nobunaga's eyes and even dared to come with an outrageous kagemusha theory--

If Nobuhide was all honeyed up, the same didn't go for the rest of the Oda family:
Lady Dota is always doting on her younger son and viceversa, as the list of hostile uncles and cousins is pretty much neverending.

The guys Nobunaga could truly count on are those included in his "inner circle". Besides his teacher, the massive Takugen Souon, and Masahide Hirate, he can count on Ikeda Tsuneoki:
--The devotion of Tsuneoki looks pretty much one-sided ahah, but it's mentioned how, his mother being Nobunaga's wet nurse, the two are pretty much like brothers... The power of breast milk!

His frail yet determined wife, Kochou (胡蝶):
Yes, she's Nouhime. The origin of this version of her real name derives from the collection of military tales Bukoyawa (武功夜話).

And above everyone else, all the brats and slaves that he managed to bring into his ranks, including "Saru" and "Inu":
--No relationship to Hideyoshi and Toshiie, though!

An original character introduced in this manga, the Spanish ex-soldier Francisco, was a slave too: captured during a travel from China to Japan, he was kidnapped and destined to be sold as a slave due to his blonde hair and blue eyes, which made him peculiarly precious.

Speaking of the historical context and the like, I liked how in this work there's a lot of talking about slavery.
This is usually considered a mere "western issue", but slaves were pretty much used and traded everywhere in the world.
"Slaves" as a social class would later merge into the hinin status of Edo times.

Also Toshiie would be among those potential slaves being saved by Nobunaga and that would lately get into his ranks.
Of course Toshiie was not of a slave "status", but it was common for pirates and traders to kidnap kids to sell at slaves markets all around Asia-- It's not like they cared about samurai and the like, back then, and this is a characteristic of this very weird retelling of Nobunaga's younger days: you can feel the "instability" of Sengoku era, without the need to insert aliens or evil ESPs here as the cause.

Among Nobu's allies, there are also Ikoma Ienaga and his sis, Rui (類):
Rui here is the famed Kitsuno. In this version she's older than Nobu and back in the days acted as his baby-sitter. Nobunaga felt weird around her, expecially because her family is "somehow related" to that of Lady Dota, and he felt like she may share the same mindset of his mother--Yeah, of course he's in love with her.

A recurring theme in this manga is that of "water". Nobunaga used to travel through Kiso river to reach Tsushima for the festival or the other Oda castles, he came up with the idea of becoming pirates so to train secretely far from his family's eyes and so on. As merchants, also the Ikoma family is related to trading by sea. Kitahara mentioned that this idea came from the fact that Nobunaga was a good swimmer in his youth. Fantasy could run wild, for real--!

Rui is extremely important because she knew about Nobu's secret-- Besides being far from an idiot, he also owns a peculiar power, that allowed him "to see" the true nature of people.
Takugen mentions how this is pretty much "a divine attribute that made Nobu close to a Buddha" (LOL!) and someone who's apt to lead men and invoke epochal changes in history.

Yeah, you got the mood of this story by now.
Still, another fun historical mention involved the making of guns.
Ginta here mentions about how he got Nobu's guns made in Kunitomo rather than in Sakai. As Sakai was pretty much focused as selling guns as expensive toys, the guys of Kunitomo made actual guns to use in actual wars.

I was amused by an alternative interpretation of the Eiraku coin.
In this scene where Nobu faced Kuki Yasutaka, the infamous pirate offered him a coin to pay for the crossing of Sanzu river.
Now, to cross Sanzu river you needed 6 mon, which was why from then on this was arranged on the nobori of Nobu armies as in a "memento mori" fashion-- I'm pretty sure this explanation belonged to the crest of the Sanada clan, but after the kagemusha thing taken from the Takeda clan I'm not surprised anymore. To bring this review to a conclusion, a quick overview of Nobunaga's "enemies".
First and foremost, Imagawa Yoshimoto.
He's represented as a beautiful, elegant and strong man. That's quite the novelty!

Saito Dousan and his trusted Akechi Mitsuhide here:

This cool guy here is a young Takeda Shingen, instead:

Long story short, this manga as an historical source is quite useless but it points out an important detail, just like Yasuke did, even if that series approached it more passively: there's nothing certain in history. If it's not documented, it doesn't mean that it didn't happen and if it's documented-- Well, it doesn't mean that it wasn't forged!
--So let's not be picky and entertain ourselves? Mmmh. Not sure this attitude suits me∼

11 comments:

  1. People are just randomly making things up these days... Fantasy elements like the magic eyes give me mixed feeling. I got the first book and wasn't sure if I'd like the rest of it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, this had a different approach than mere "making things up".
      There are series that made things up to prove their point (see "The Man who killed Oda Nobunaga") or to fill gaps. In my opinion, that's not acceptable, even if entertaining as an intellectual exercise.

      Then there are those who made up things just because they want to make their story fun, as in those isekai things. See, that's a more "innocent" and honest attitude that I may support and accept for what it is.

      Also, I'm a fan of Tetsuo Hara, so I'm biased XD

      Delete
    2. Well, if I can find the rest of the series I'll give Ikusa no Ko a try.

      The Man who killed Oda Nobunaga? Isn't that the weird manga written by the guy claiming to be Akechi's descendant? Bleh.

      Delete
    3. Yeah! It's like on of those conspiracy theories to show us that the truth was covered up to make people accept the new world oder :D
      --To be honest it intrigued me, but I couldn't find anything at a decent price around (I tried to look for the French edition, too). --I guess that the "traitor" in this version may be Ieyasu? Dunno.

      Delete
    4. I don't mind manga going into "this is the secret history that REALLY happened". But the magic/supernatural stuff in is a bit too much, since this isn't meant to be a fantasized AU/what-if. I don't think Ikusa no Ko series is officially licensed in English. Too bad.

      ... er, well... If Akechi Kenzaburou is the writer, then Mitsuhide DID do it. But there is a conspiracy theory where Nobunaga for some reason wanted to kill Ieyasu, based on an interpretation of a memoir written by an Akechi soldier. And Kenzaburou kind of obviously hates Hideyoshi. He was super bitter about it in his blogs and personal comments.

      Delete
    5. Don't know, the fact is that this is not just a manga, but a manga based on an actual historical essay of this guy, so, yeah, it's not like some fiction, but it pretends to be "the truth". And this is a stance that irks me.

      You mean Hideyoshi-! I thought that too, but in the chapters that I read it's mentioned that Akechi acted in accord with Ieyasu, and Ieyasu was supposed to regroup with his army to support him... If anything, Hideyoshi just "seized the day", but didn't really play an active part on the conspiracy... Or at least, that's my vague impression after reading just two mere volumes out of 8 ^__^; --Which was the series that made it a whole Hideyoshi's plot? "Hyouge Mono", maybe--?
      I did enjoy that, though.

      Delete
    6. Sorry I was talking about two things at once. When I said magic I mean Ikusa no Ko, because there's the magic eyes that you mentioned. Even if it's dramatization, it feels a bit strange.

      -- About the "Man Who Killed Nobunag" manga. No no, I didn't say Hideyoshi did it. In Akechi Kenzaburou theory, Mitsuhide did it, but it's because Nobunaga tried to kill Ieyasu. Hideyoshi just took advantage of the situation. Yes, his books are supposed to be "non-fiction". It's supposed to be analysis of real history.

      I consider Kenzaburou to be kind of a bullshit researcher, his opinions is very biased. There's so many things wrong because he's also relying on secondary information. He's really no better than you and me in terms of research. The only advantage he has is that he's Japanese and has better access to data.

      Delete
    7. --I was talking about "The Man who Killed Nobunaga" only.

      Oh, I see, I didn't investigate the original essays because I assumed they were apologetic towards Mitsuhide and Hideyoshi was to blame... I was wrong, then.

      Well then, who knows, it may be plausible. Not sure why Mitsuhide would care so much about Ieyasu, though XD

      Delete
    8. That is because there is a testimony written by an Akechi soldier who was present at Honnouji saying that he thought they were going "after Ieyasu". One of the possible translation of the ancient grammar seems like it's saying he thought they were going to invade Ieyasu in Kyoto.

      But the translation is being disputed, and other possible translations are being considered.

      There is an English translation of the Akechi soldier testimony. I think the man's name is Honjo Saemon? I don't have the link right now, but it's probably on Google or Wikipedia somewhere.

      Delete
    9. Ok, but my question was "Why would Mitsuhide care about Ieyasu?"
      --When did they become best buddies?

      Delete
    10. Eh, they don't have to be friend. The argument about why hr cares was about honour and that kind of thing. It's the new cliché that Akechi is very upstanding and honourable and perfect gentleman and everything.

      I mean, sounds biased but whatever :p

      Delete